Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:19

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Is hollywood evil?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Rents fall in most U.S. metros since 2023 as demand struggles to keep up with supply - Seeking Alpha

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Do any other guys like to eat cum of another man from their wife's pussy?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Engineers bring Psyche's thrusters back online - theregister.com

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Secret leprosy infected the Americas before European arrival - DW

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

GLP-1 drugs may be linked to elevated risk of serious eye disease, study finds - statnews.com

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Scientists identify time and location of first humans who made tools and harpoons out of whale bones - Earth.com

Thank you.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

What’s next?

FIFA Club World Cup: What LAFC, Miami & Seattle need to advance - MLSsoccer.com

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Eum sit quibusdam aperiam culpa ipsa culpa odio.